Clinton: CYA?

[outsider]

Yeah, what I was saying is that I didn't read enough to decide if I agreed with you as to whether or not he was suggesting they were terrorists, so I can't really add anything of value to that.

Who was I saying or suggesting was a terrorist?

[MsThang]

Who was I saying or suggesting was a terrorist?

I dunno :dunno:

That's precisely why I stayed out of it.

I believe Tex was saying you didn't think Al Quaeda and the like were terrorists.

[TheZenMan]

You ask if I mean the absolutely least unlikely thing when I write something. You want to get hung up on the least noteworthy part of what I write. Why then should you be getting so upset that I want you to use a regular definition of a word instead of making a new definition up on the fly?



Yup, we established that that is the group you are talking about.





Yes. You write as though that is an absolute definition. You don't actually acknowledge anything other than what you want to see. Terrorist is a very specific word, one that you just aren't using correctly. You are speaking of sociopaths or psychopaths. Some terrorists are sociopaths or psychopaths and some socio/psychopaths are terrorists but not all terrorists are socio/psychopaths and not all socio/psychopaths are terrorists. You can argue with that logic all you want but again, it won't change anything.




No, a sociopath is someone with a mental disorder that may lead to criminal behavior. Criminal thought is not criminal behavior and should not be confused for it. Trying to blend the two won't help your end of the discussion.


Yes. You described someone that may be a terrorist and may have tendencies to be a terrorist but not someone that absolutely is a terrorist.




You logic is broken and never will be fixed until you sit down and reevaluate quite a few things. All you've said in so many words is that you are afraid and that you hate. No more, no less.

Fucking what?

[outsider]

I dunno :dunno:

That's precisely why I stayed out of it.

I believe Tex was saying you didn't think Al Quaeda and the like were terrorists.


Which would be a good reason for me to keep him on my ignore list.... heh

[outsider]

Fucking what?

Your logic=broken and I demonstrated that pretty well already.

[outsider]

Just a FYI, folks with bad logic hate being called on it. I don't have such an issue saying as such though,

[Tex]

Just a FYI, folks with bad logic hate being called on it. I don't have such an issue saying as such though,

Kind of like you didn't like being called on your "bad logic" in the thread about FISA. I know you say you can't read this (bullshit) but you're a fucking megalomaniac. Plain and simple.

I, again, feel sorry for this supposed woman who decided to get with you. I pity her more than words can say.

BTW, this will be my last post your way EVER. Now, go fuck yourself.

[TheZenMan]

Kind of like you didn't like being called on your "bad logic" in the thread about FISA. I know you say you can't read this (bullshit) but you're a fucking megalomaniac. Plain and simple.

I, again, feel sorry for this supposed woman who decided to get with you. I pity her more than words can say.

BTW, this will be my last post your way EVER. Now, go fuck yourself.

He's got you on ignore, he's made that very clear by posting delusional bullshit in threads YOU started. Not that the thread topic has any value to the discussions that take place in it though.

:eyeroll:

[outsider]

He's got you on ignore, he's made that very clear by posting delusional bullshit in threads YOU started. Not that the thread topic has any value to the discussions that take place in it though.

:eyeroll:

So basically you're trying to cry foul that I reply to something you posted and should fairly well how you haven't applied logic to the subject in your lizard brained remarks? Should I build a boat for the river you seem to want to cry?